Sonographic cortical bone thickness measurement: can it predict bone mineral density in the pediatric population?
dc.authorid | Dirican, Onur/0000-0003-0511-6611 | |
dc.authorid | Isin, Ugur Ufuk/0000-0003-1684-1624 | |
dc.authorid | Husseini, Abbas Ali/0000-0002-8861-7106 | |
dc.contributor.author | Isin, Ugur Ufuk | |
dc.contributor.author | Cakmakci, Emin | |
dc.contributor.author | Bulus, Ayse Derya | |
dc.contributor.author | Yasartekin, Yuksel | |
dc.contributor.author | Unal, Oznur | |
dc.contributor.author | Dirican, Onur | |
dc.contributor.author | Husseini, Abbas Ali | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-09-11T19:53:16Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-09-11T19:53:16Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2024 | |
dc.department | İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | PURPOSE To explore sonographic cortical bone thickness (CoT) as a potential indicator of bone mineral density (BMD) measured by dual -energy X-ray absorptiometry for screening and diagnosing pediatric osteoporosis. METHODS A prospective study included 41 osteopenic or osteoporotic patients and 52 healthy children. Radius cortical thickness (R-CoT), tibial cortical thickness (T-CoT), and second metatarsal cortical thickness (M-CoT) were measured by B -mode ultrasound; CoT values were compared between groups and the correlation between BMD and CoT was examined. RESULTS There were no significant differences in R-CoT ( P = 0.433), T-CoT ( P = 0.057), and M-CoT ( P = 0.978) values between the patient and control groups. No significant correlations were found between BMD T -scores and R-CoT (r = -0.073, P = 0.490), T-CoT (r = -0.154, P = 0.141), and M-CoT (r = 0.047, P = 0.657) values. CONCLUSION Sonographic CoT values in children do not correlate with BMD values. Unlike in adults, sonographic CoT measurements do not appear to have a role in assessing BMD in the pediatric population. | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.4274/dir.2023.232392 | |
dc.identifier.endpage | 204 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1305-3612 | |
dc.identifier.issue | 3 | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 38044613 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85193102891 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 200 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.4274/dir.2023.232392 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11363/8108 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 30 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:001237737400004 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wosquality | N/A | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Web of Science | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Turkish Soc Radiology | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Diagnostic And Interventional Radiology | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
dc.snmz | 20240903_G | en_US |
dc.subject | Osteoporosis | en_US |
dc.subject | children | en_US |
dc.subject | bone | en_US |
dc.subject | density | en_US |
dc.subject | cortical | en_US |
dc.subject | thickness | en_US |
dc.subject | ultrasonography | en_US |
dc.title | Sonographic cortical bone thickness measurement: can it predict bone mineral density in the pediatric population? | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |