Comparison of three different biomaterials used in in vitro molar apexification models

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridsirinoglu capan, belen/0000-0003-1829-0379
dc.authoridKALAOGLU, Elif Ece/0000-0003-0932-3706
dc.authoridocak, mert/0000-0001-6832-6208
dc.authoridBilecenoglu, Burak/0000-0001-7097-1572
dc.authoridDuman, Canan/0000-0003-1240-1285
dc.contributor.authorKalaoglu, Elif Ece
dc.contributor.authorDuman, Canan
dc.contributor.authorCapan, Belen Sirinoglu
dc.contributor.authorOcak, Mert
dc.contributor.authorBilecenoglu, Burak
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-11T19:52:29Z
dc.date.available2024-09-11T19:52:29Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentİstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjectivesNew biomaterials had some advantages such as mixing and easier application as compared to traditional MTA in single step apexification method. This study aimed to compare the three biomaterials used in the apexification treatment of immature molar teeth in terms of the time spent, the quality of the canal filling and the number of x-rays taken to complete the process.MethodsThe root canals of the extracted thirty molar teeth were shaped with rotary tools. To obtain the apexification model, ProTaper F3 was used retrograde. The teeth were randomly assigned into three groups based on the material used to seal the apex; Group 1: Pro Root MTA, Group 2: MTA Flow, Group 3: Biodentine. The amounts of the filling, the number of radiographs taken until treatment completion and the treatment duration were recorded. Then teeth were fixed for micro computed tomography imaging for quality evaluation of canal filling.ResultsBiodentine was superior to the other filling materials according to time. MTA Flow provided greater filling volume than the other filling materials in the rank comparison for the mesiobuccal canals. MTA Flow had greater filling volume than ProRoot MTA in the palatinal/distal canals(p = 0.039). Biodentine had greater filling volume more than MTA Flow in the mesiolingual/distobuccal canals (p = 0.049).ConclusionsMTA Flow was found as a suitable biomaterial according to the treatment time and quality of root canal fillings.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12903-023-03180-y
dc.identifier.issn1472-6831
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.pmid37391750en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85163894830en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03180-y
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11363/7950
dc.identifier.volume23en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001020887000003en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBmcen_US
dc.relation.ispartofBmc Oral Healthen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.snmz20240903_Gen_US
dc.subjectApexificationen_US
dc.subjectMulti-rooted teethen_US
dc.subjectMTAen_US
dc.subjectMTA Flowen_US
dc.subjectBiodentineen_US
dc.titleComparison of three different biomaterials used in in vitro molar apexification modelsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu